Cyber Risk Barometer
Cyber Risk Barometer · working paper

Attacked vs defended: cyber risk by sector

Two lenses on the same question, side by side. Attacked: each sector's share of the 90 headline incidents in our three-year global log. Defended: how well the UK-listed companies in that sector protect their email (DMARC against impersonation, TLS enforcement in transit). The point is the gap between the two.

Read this carefully — the two columns are different measures. The attack count is a curated global sample, and it reflects what becomes visible (through disclosure rules and press coverage), not where risk is truly highest. The email-defence columns cover only UK-listed FTSE 250 operating companies, and only email — not a sector's overall security. Sectors from the two datasets are mapped to one shared set; some appear in only one lens (government and education have no FTSE 250 members; real estate and transport barely feature in the global log). Nothing here is a score of any one company.
Share of logged attacksEmail defence (DMARC enforced)
SectorAttacks·ShareFTSE firms·DMARC enf.TLS enf.Read
Government & public15
17%––no listed firms–Attacked, but no FTSE 250 members — mostly public sector.
Technology & software14
16%12
83%–
Financial services10
11%24
92%1Attacked and well defended.
Healthcare & pharma8
9%6
67%1Gap: heavily attacked, email defence lagging.
Retail & consumer7
8%28
71%1
Telecoms & media7
8%7
100%–Well defended.
Travel, leisure & hospitality7
8%11
73%1
Energy, utilities & infrastructure4
4%11
45%–Weak email defence.
Education5
6%––no listed firms–Attacked, but no FTSE 250 members — mostly public sector.
Manufacturing & industrials3
3%23
87%3
Professional & support services2
2%8
100%2Well defended.
Transport & logistics0
0%5
60%–In the index, but not visible in the global incident log.
Real estate & construction0
0%26
58%1In the index, but not visible in the global incident log.
Other8
9%––no listed firms–Attacked, but no FTSE 250 members — mostly public sector.

What stands out